- The Geometry -

  Frankly, I never did like the expression "computer simulation" but it still is good enough for the current purpose. We exist only in the mind of the Supreme Being. The first clue to note is you did ask this question by accident and the second clue to note is your consciousness is a reflection of a higher consciousness. If you understand that your personal consciousness does not belong to you, is entrusted to you temporarily, and is a relection of a Higher Consciousness, you have taken the first steps in the direction to getting to the answers that you seek. The universe is filled with that which your personal consciousness finds pleasing, even mesmerizing. If your mind is not cluttered with cacophonous waves, waves and signals that cause interference with your subjective consciousness. Key to understanding is to declutter your mind and understand what breathing means. The lower is a reflection of the higher. Harmonic motion and circumambulation are rela...

To think about this without recognizing that the simulator exists is futile and ought to be abandoned. To me, it’s just another dissipative way to avoid the obvious, which is the traditional message of old. The simulator is obsessed with the love of beauty. Intelligent design just doesn’t go far enough. The whole universe is built upon the idea that every construct great and small bend to aesthetic principles. I’ll be quick and point out the wave function is a beauty construct and everything else must necessarily follow from this. The link between the love of beauty and its subjective foundations lie in the realm of logarithms: The "logarithmic connection" of the wave function is not a single equation but a conceptual and computational bridge linking: - Linear quantum mechanics → Nonlinear Riccati/Hamilton-Jacobi dynamics - Wave function → Probability fluid, phase topology, and information geometry - Exact solutions → Semiclassical asymptotics and stable numerics T...

Ontological aesthetics is defined as the understanding that the universe is created with aesthetics in mind, exploring the relationship between aesthetics and ontology.  It critiques subjective-anthropological conceptions of beauty and defines an ontological conception of the beautiful, emphasizing the unity of beauty's being and rejecting traditional metaphysical dichotomies.  This approach seeks to redefine aesthetic experiences from a non-reductive perspective, reflecting recent trends in philosophical aesthetics.

  AdS-CFT conjecture from a GR perspective  -  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RzsQOYjjW0&t Transcript 0:02 today will be much less ranty and less physics II well somewhat less physics II 0:07 there'll be an increasing amount of geometry hopefully so last time I told 0:16 you about what adsf tears it's a conjectured correspondence or duality physical equivalence between on the one 0:25 hand quantum certain quantum field theories which are theories as we discussed that live on some fixed 0:32 space-time and a quantum mechanical and on the other side of the correspondence 0:37 certain quantum theories of gravity we could call them but really they're quantum theories where space and time is 0:44 dynamic that's what one might most generally call a gravitational theory and you know there are conjectured 0:56 specific examples of this correspondence where you know what both the theories on 1:01 both sides are and there's a lot of evidence in particular for this sort ...