Commentary on the DNA Molecule

 


1. There is no way that the DNA molecule can be formed without a program, meaning, a programmer must be behind it.


2. The C value paradox evaporates if one views DNA under the lens of aesthetics. With less than 1% of the human genome intelligibly coding for function, we need to overthrow it. Period. It is clear that DNA is far from being a functional molecule. It is better to view DNA as an aesthetic phenomenon with functional elements thrown in to make it work.

A change in perspectives is crucial but with funding and livelihoods at stake, such a perspective wouldn't be entertained.

The view that the DNA molecule and everything else in nature is due to aesthetics just isn't popular, even though semiotics tells us so. I don't want to be to explicit but my implication is clear enough.

The existence of fractals and fractal-like structures point invariably to an obsession with beauty behind the cosmos.

Popular posts from this blog

Using concepts in semiotics in as great detail as possible, how to measure the DNA molecule for its aesthetic value and the extent that principles of aesthetics play a part before its formation?

Connection between Catalan numbers with the Fibonacci Sequence

Islamic Aesthetics - Prof. Nasr